On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Horace,
As a secondary test after Argon I would also try hydrogen,
Mills' results and Haisch Moddel patent seem to indicate a preference
for small monatomic atoms, As far as trying to intensify your field I
agree with your plan to downsize assuming success with Argon but
should
it turn out the field is preferential and you need to initiate
plasma to
set up mechanical linkage between the gas and the plates then the
larger
size cells may be better to dissipate the excess heat (Haisch-Moddel
using .1 micron diameter holes)- This gets into a can of worms to
initially disassociate the gas and then throttle it back once it
starts
to cascade or you will get a brief strong "pulse" of momentum transfer
analogous to the Rowan confirmation spike in Rayney nickel and then
find
your cells shorted closed or with nickel cat whiskers across the
cavity
just like a battery(nature wants to satisfy those plates closing).
Anyway my point is that your theory is fine assuming plasma doesn't
need
to be present but if it does all bets are off and it becomes an
exercise
in thermodynamics.
Regards
Fran
A device based on cavity inertial mass change should work many orders
of magnitude better using the spinning disk nano-technology approach
mentioned earlier, or possibly a using a superfluid, as mentioned
earlier. Both increase the density and velocity by orders of
magnitude, and thus the mass flow by orders of magnitude and the
centrifugal force by orders of magnitude cubed.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
