The following update has been appended to:

http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ZPE-CasimirThrust.pdf

my "ZPE-Casimir Inertial Drive" article.

If I made no simple calculation error the prospective performance of this design, even at fairly large element sizes, is startling. Using nano-technology the performance could be improved by orders of magnitude.


Update 8/9/2009:

Another design for a Casimir thruster, based yet again on the premise that matter within a Casimir cavity has reduced inertia, is based on oscillating a nano-structure beam into and out of a Casimir cavity. A microelectromechanical system (MEMS) beam can be electronically activated as a pendulum which oscillates in the MHz range. For example, see US Patent 6,531,668. An array of beams are created in a sheet array which can be placed over a plate with matching grooves in it located so as to act as cavities for the beams when acting as pendula. The beams then oscillate into and out of their repsective cavities. When the beams are down in their respective Casimir Cavities they all accelerate in a direction toward out of the cavity, and when out of the cavity they accelerate in a direction toward their cavities. This is an ideal arrangement for creating thrust in the direction towards out of the cavities, because the beam ends will have less mass when in the cavities.

For a very rough performance estimate, suppose silicon beams are used that are 100 microns long, thickness 2 microns, and width 5 microns. Assume only the far half of the pendulum is active in producing force, giving an active volume 50 microns long, with thickness 2 microns, and width 5 microns. Using 2.33 g/cm^3 for silicon, we have an active mass of 1.165x10^-12 kg. Assume it swings to a depth of 5 microns into the cavity, and at a rate of 4 MHz. Its total swing is 10 microns, so it covers that distance with an average velocity v of (10 microns)*(2 * 4 MHz) = 80 m/s. It changes from v to -v twice each 1/(4 MHz) = 2.5x10^-7 seconds, giving an average acceleration of 2*(80m/s)/(2.5x10^-7 s) = 6.4x10^8 m/s^2. Suppose the Casimir cavity mass change is 1/100th the gross mass. The effective mass is then (1.165x10^-12 kg) * 0.1 = (1.165x10^-14 kg) . A net force f = m*a = (1.165x10^-14 kg)*(6.4x10^8 m/s^2) = 7.46x10^-6 N = 7.6x10^-7 kgf.

Assume the cavity plates are 30 microns thick and the beam support plates are 30 microns thick, for a layer thickness of 60 microns or 16,600 layers per meter. Assume the beams are repeated every 10 microns laterally, or 100,000 per meter. Assume the beams are repeated every 150 microns, or 6,600 per meter. The number of beams per cubic meter is then 16,600 * 100,000 * 6,600 = 1.1x10^13. The total force per cubic meter of pendula is then (1.1x10^13) = 8.3x10^6 kgf, or 8,300 metric tons. Now that is robust! If the Casimir cavity induced mass change is only 1/100,000, then the trust per cubic meter of pendula is 8,300 kg. Still robust! This is clearly the preferred method.

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to