You forgot the early SPAWAR claims of tritium by codep, that's inexpensive isn't it? But again, doesn't the fact that they are now trying other LENR detection techniques, necessarily less convincing than tritium, suggest they have since found a mundane explanation for the apparent tritium increase?
Michel 2009/9/19, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>: > I forgot to list Tom Claytor at Los Alamos. As most readers here know he has > also produced tritium. The technique is different. Actually, unlike the > bulk-Pd D2O experiments, Claytor's approach has not been replicated much, so > there would be some benefit to an independent replication. > > You can read all about it at LENR-CANR.org. > > His experiment have not been funded for many years. > > His experiments are also far too difficult to be replicated by inexperienced > people outside of a fully-equipped lab. > > I am sure Claytor's claims are correct, since his work was extensively > peer-reviewed. Tritium has the great benefit that it can be independently > confirmed by different methods long after the experiment ends. It is not > like heat, which you have to capture then and there. Many people are skilled > at detecting tritium because it is hazardous. At BARC, the tritium was > confirmed by the reactor safety division experts. (BARC is both a research > laboratory and also a power reactor facility.) > > - Jed >
