At 11:03 AM 10/22/2009, Lawrence de Bivort wrote:

What do you think? Does this make sense? Do you want me to say more about 'out-framing'? Or does the above give you an adequate sense of what I am talking about?


I think I know what you mean. It would be a piece of writing that systematically approaches the misconceptions that keep people from taking a closer look at the evidence.

It would start by stating very clearly the reasons why cold fusion is possible, establishing and showing a clear understanding of why it would be properly rejected.

Then it would carefully, and step-by-step, dismantle this.

The trick, though, would be getting a dedicated skeptic to read it. Perhaps you approach him and ask him for a favor, would he criticize this? But you'd have to have the connection with him.

Reply via email to