This is the eternal argument, and the last one that people come up
with. There appears to be an imbalance that the battery-fed circuit
gets from the battery, that the circuit balances out and some of the
balancing reaction is tapped for doing work. Most of these start as
energysavings and increased efficiency. Until the tuning and re-
modeling allows the tinkerer to go further. By the time they are
further away in experimentation they dont take anyone seriously who
insists on closing the loop. If Steorn are anywhere close to the other
open-system contraptions such as what Bedini is instructing people to
build, it just will never beclosed-loop until what's there is studied
seriously and no crutches are grasped for, be they fancy names for
statistical laws or anything else that allows for an argumentative
argument. Let's see what their (Steorn's) reasons are for requiring a
battery. If it really is transformation that they're tapping, they'll
have to explain away the battery-requirement like a bunch of adults.
Of course theyll be mocked for having a battery by anyone who believes
they're doing nothing but fooling investors.
iPoni sent dis message. Esa Ruoho wrote it.
On 15.12.2009, at 16.46, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote:
So... if the generator recharges the battery, then why not just
disconnect the battery and run the thing with the power from the
generator?
I think it's a crock...
Craig (Houston)
