OK, now for a really wild suggestion..again with my Casimir cavities but this time CLOSED Casimir cells in the materials used for these mechanical OU devices where ambient gases are trapped forever at the time the of formation ...QUE wild theories for movement of pyramid blocks :) where fractional state gases are excited inside the cavities while the block is in motion opposing change in potential energy ... Maybe unintenional interaction with these materials is unknowingly affecting these gases in an asymmetrical manner - say a magnetic field interacting with the gas in one direction but switched off in the other. Instead of hydrinos we could have fractional states of nitrogen and oxygen. One myth of pyramid building was elevating the blocks on special materials, then striking the blocks with a metal rod and then being able to scoot the blocks 2 bowlengths before the block came back down to rest at ground level. The idea being that the fractional state atoms interact with space time at a different rate and in their translated state act like claws in space time opposing any change in inertia. Same for other myths of calcium based megalith levitation -always seems to involve a stone with metal based chemistry like calcium which is more conductive than copper at micro scale. HEEHE HA HA HOHO to the funny farm where things are wonderful all day long. Fran
From: Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan [mailto:alset9te...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:06 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:any thoughts on this new Steorn video where 2 engineers and a physicist are baffled at their 308% overunity results? No intelligent life:-) Tongue-in-Cheek is an Irish default state-of-mind 24-7-365, Ultser Marching Season not withstanding. Case in Point: Most Irish pub-goer's first after-pub-stop within the general vicinity of the 'Blarney-Stone' is made at said famous 'Stone' upon which said pub-goers relieve themselves upon said Stone's face: And then first-thing American (mostly) Tourists duely arrive in the morning & dutifully obey the ancient custom of kissing said Stone face. . . . ?Are we 'getting-this' yet?~:-) Steorn miraculous-overunity has kept 'us' guessing for a while; and the Steorn-Micks are chuckling over their Guiness. . . It's purported that the wee-folk luv-ta-tip the guarges upon occaission whilst the lab-boyos are well inta their dailly 'toasts;' no harm, it's all in fun. . .~;-) OFF TOPIC: ?What was that about "No intelligent life on planets discovered including not upon Earth as well?"~:-) > From: jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:any thoughts on this new Steorn video where 2 engineers and > a physicist are baffled at their 308% overunity results? > Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:02:39 -0700 > > Let me add another very specific detail that I think Terry will agree to: an > inexpensive meter (dedicated power analyzer) from these folks is the missing > recommendation from Steorn (for good reason): > > http://www.valhallascientific.com/wattmeters-power-analyzers/index.shtml > > ... since it will likely uncover self-delusion based on inaccurate scope > readings. Get one ! if you are one of their evaluators. EBay usually has them > at a discount and many other companies make more expensive versions. > > Spiky power cannot be measured accurately with an oscilloscope by anyone less > than a professional with years of experience and a top of the line scope. > > The Valhalla permits this to be accomplished by amateurs, and even by most of > the Steorn 'experts', cough, cough (which is not to agree that there are any) > - thanks to the DSP and modern technology, so ask yourself why this is not > mentioned prominently ? > > The savings in cost of the meter is in the range of 10-1 over a good DSP > scope with power analyzer functionality - but they don't mention it due to > the fact they suspect the scam will be uncovered before they can flush out > all of the gullible testers around the globe with an extra $500 bucks to > burn, or whatever this $cam amounts to at this time... laughing all the way > to pub, mates! > > Having said that - I will concede that there could be net OU with their > device - in the sense of high-grade energy P-in (i.e. electrical) and low > grade energy (heat) P-out. But this is not claimed, since even if it were > true it will be small and will not bring in funds for continuing the > high-life in Dublin. > > For that kind of OU determination, only a precision calorimeter will suffice. > If you don't have one, why waste your time? ... and where is theirs? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton > > I have been making measurements of pulse motors for many years. It's > easy to make mistakes. One should be careful in placing too much > faith in the measuring instruments. It's always good to approach an > amazing result from various angles. > > That being said, I have never failed to be able to explain, even to > non-technical people, exactly what I am measuring and what the result > means. The Orboadvocates seem unable to do this simple thing. > > Many mistakes result from trying to use power calculations to > determine efficiency. In cyclical systems, I have found it far easier > to make energy per cycle calculations and they are less prone to > error. > > T > > >
