On 01/18/2011 11:04 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com > <mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>> wrote: > > Rossi could keep his black box method and still prove his claims > with a 24 hour stress test that would produce far more energy than > he could possibly > > Conceal inside the black box. > > > He has done that. People have told me they witnessed that, albeit not > at a national university setting, with professors doing the > installation and running of the calorimetry. I think they did some > longer runs in the weeks leading up to this demo, but I have not heard > how long they were. I asked, but they did not get around to answering. > > Despite Rossi's odd nature, he has done a good job of revealing his > device. I think he has done as much as anyone can do without revealing > trade secrets. I am afraid it is futile to try to protect trade > secrets, but I understand why he is trying. It is hard to think of a > better way to proceed given the patent situation.
CLOSE THE LOOP. He says he can run without any electrical input. Ergo he /can/ close the loop, without the expense of a Stirling motor and generator. > > - Jed >
