--- On Tue, 2/8/11, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The New Thorium Cycle ?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 9:52 PM



Thanks for the information George.
As you know, there is little way to avoid "further speculation" in this group, 
but I am going to try to abstain, as it is probably counterproductive at this 
stage.

Jones
What about this comment found at
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread459969/pg1
The Nazi Bell was in fact an Accelerator Driven nuclear reactor (ADS device) to 
breed Uranium U233 from Thorium 232 for an A-bomb. Nazi Germany was not in 1944 
looking for anti-gravity breakthroughs. 

Anyone who follows the history of Nazi Germany will realise that Germany had 
very limited resources and in 1944, all efforts were being directed towards 
breakthough wonder weapons. In particular huge resources were poured into 
nuclear weapons development. Dornberger disclosed under British internment that 
Hitler had told him the V2 was destined to have a far more important warhead 
than mere explosives. 

Nazi Germany faced a long uphill slog to create an A-bomb from plutonium or 
uranium enrichment, but with a high energy Proton generator in the Nazi bell, 
Germany could bombard Thorium 232 to produce Uranium 233 which could easily be 
used in a gun detonator type, A-bomb. 

By using Thorium the Nazis could breed Uranium 233 for a bomb without costly 
enrichment.

The ADS reactor is a whole lot smarter and faster than building Oak Ridge and 
Hanniford etc. You don't need to enrich Uranium with an ADS. Throw in some 
Thorium oxide and some Beryllium oxide. Spin some mercury around it under very 
high voltage and the Beryllium donates neutrons to the Thorium to become 
Uranium 233. So simple.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: George Holz 

Jones Beene wrote:
[JB] There are some heavy hitters in DoE and the major Universities
behind thorium as a replacement for uranium. But that is for use 
in an expensive breeding cycle which has most of the negatives 
of any fission scheme.
[GH] The company behind the thorium + uranium cycle is Lightbridge.
The improvements this fuel provides are very significant and solve 
many of the major problems with present reactors with just a change
in the fuel rods. Read about the technology on their website. 
http://www.ltbridge.com/technologyservices/fueltechnology/designs
[snip]
[GH] At the risk of encouraging further speculation, here are some more
details about the Cincinnati Group results. The device used zirconium
electrodes and  high current AC electrolysis resulting in both high temperature 
(280 F) and significant pressure ( 4 atm.) inside the bolted together mostly 
metal device.

Extensive analysis work was done in several labs mostly  by ICP/MS. The
starting solution was thorium nitrate. The thorium was apparently
transformed into titanium and copper with 10x as much titanium as copper. The 
isotopic ratios of both elements were very far from normal.
Much information is available in IE Vol. 3 No. 13 & No. 14 double issue
1997.
George Holz 
Varitronics Systems






      

Reply via email to