Joshua Cude wrote:
What I know doesn't matter, but it is very clear that most people who know as much about tritium as your stars, don't believe the measurements, or at least don't believe they come from cold fusion.
That is incorrect. There is no published papers from experts in tritium pointing out errors, or even expressing doubt (except Clarke).
Perhaps if you find some expert in tritium, stop him in the hallway and ask "is the tritium from cold fusion real?" he might say "no." That does not count.
The same is true of the calorimetry and chemistry. Apart from people like Huizenga, Close and half of the anonymous DoE review board, every signed, published review by experts who have looked closely and actually read the literature agrees with Gerisher: "In spite of my earlier conclusion, -- and that of the majority of scientists, -- that the phenomena reported by Fleischmann and Pons in 1989 depended either on measurement errors or were of chemical origin, there is now undoubtedly overwhelming indications that nuclear processes take place in the metal alloys."
The experts say the evidence is "undoubtedly overwhelming." You say it is noise and error but as far as anyone knows you have not published any papers or pointed out any actual errors, so I do not think you have any credibility.
- Jed
