Robin ,
I made the mistake of starting from the bottom of the email replies -
your position that the ash is roughly proportional would have balanced Scott
Smith's position that there is far too much ash for heat extracted - I made
some assumption in my previous reply that were based on the position of there
being too much ash. Given your position, I may have been way too pre-mature in
speculating the heat extracted could be the difference between the nuclear and
ZPE.
Regards
Fran
-----Original Message-----
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 4:09 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Magnetostriction and Cavitation ll
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:49:28 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
> The E-cat certainly appears to include nuclear reactions but I don't know if
> it was ever established that the amount of ash produced was proportional to
> energy output.
It does appear to be at least roughly so.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
