In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Sat, 7 May 2011 02:47:06 -0400:
Hi,

You fail to explain why pure Hydrogen would fuse to copper.

>Explaining Rossi.
>
>
>
>Rossi said: “We think that all the Ni participates to the reactions, even if
>some isotopes should be more efficient.” “Only Ni 62 and Ni64 react.”
>
>
>
>Rossi enriches his nickel in Ni62 and Ni64. Why? Through experimentation,
>Rossi found these isotopes performed best. But what is the theory behind
>this result?
>
>
>
>Nickel-62 is an isotope of nickel having 28 protons and 34 neutrons. It is a
>stable isotope, with the highest binding energy per nucleon of any known
>nuclide (8.7945 MeV). The high binding energy of nickel isotopes in general
>makes nickel an "end product" of many nuclear reactions (including neutron
>capture reactions) throughout the universe and accounts for the high
>relative abundance of nickel and nickel-60 (the second-most, with the other
>stable isotopes (nickel-61, nickel-62, and nickel-64) being quite rare).
>
>
>
>Nickel is the least likely element to participate in a fusion reaction.
>
>
>
>If atomic holes are the place where the Rossi reaction occurs, Rossi wants a
>very strong and stable support structure that can provide a three
>dimensional quantum box that can produce the reaction.
>
>
>
>Under the assumption that only hydrogen reacts in the quantum box and that
>many hydrogen atoms are fused in the Rossi reaction; the packing of all
>those hydrogen atoms into the lattice defects of nickel is a stressful
>process. If this nickel built Heisenberg box were to fail or fail apart
>during the packing of hydrogen, then the reaction will fail.
>
>
>
>Nickel is the most stable element because its binding energy is maximized
>among the elements. The nickel isotopes that are the most stable are Ni62
>and Ni64. Rossi enriches his nickel in these most stable and stout isotopes
>because they can best support the atomic defects he uses to produce atomic
>events without blowing the lattice defects apart during the stresses of the
>atomic reactions and were nickel garbage would poison the pure
>hydrogen  reaction.
>
>
>
>
>Elements on either side of nickel will perform best because of their very
>high binding energies.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to