> About a month ago Mauro said that what had happened was thus far a proof > of > safety.
You're right, but "thus far" was just after the first explosion, and based on publicly available information. I changed my mind just one or two days later, after the explosion in number 3, and particularly, the internal explosion at the number 2 reactor. > Now that they admit there was a full meltdown in the reactor, do you now > still think that Nuclear power is safe? (or will every meltdown be the > exception?) I still think that the risks of nuclear energy are preferable to the risks and consequences of other forms of energy. Like, by example, when countries are invaded and millions of people killed because of their oil reserves.
