I agree- the essence is that the process works- at high intensity- and very probably all the other conditions will be solved - we will see with what price. The difference between the Piantelli and the Rossi process is the possible basis of patenting. As I see the future developments rather soon we will see many competing Ni-H energy sources. A strong patent umbrelll type, just could slow down this process. This week it is better to abstain from predictions. Peter
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck wrote: > > Rossi has declared: " My process has NOTHING to do with >> the process of Piantelli. The proof is that I have operating reactors and >> he not." He has not said - for example I made an radical improvement of the >> existing system . . . >> > > Well, it does not matter what he claims, or even what he himself believes. > Either this is the same process as Piantelli's or it isn't. That's a matter > of fact, not opinion. > > I think it is extremely unlikely there are many different and unrelated > newly discovered methods of getting massive amounts of non-chemical energy > from nickel hydrides, and these methods have no connection to the Pd-D > effect. I find that so unlikely, I dismiss that possibility. > > If Rossi means that Piantelli's speculation about the mechanism is wrong, > and the two effects are the same but Rossi's own explanation is superior, > that's another matter. Rossi has some difficulty expressing himself in > English, and that might be what he has in mind. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
