At 08:54 PM 7/17/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote:

However, "just right" in terms of exact full vaporization is difficult to reach, from an engineering perspective . . .


Naa. It is a piece of cake. Just listen to the boiling and keep an eye on the temperature. As soon as it overflows you have non-boiling water coming through, and the temperature drops several degrees. It would not be close to boiling if the flow is too fast for it to boil.

Jed, this is dead wrong. This is obvious. Suppose you have *almost* full vaporization, not all the water is boiling, so water level in the E-Cat will rise. Eventually, some will spill out. What is the temperature of this water? It's the same temperature as the vapor before! No change in temperature will occur.

Basically, if there is constant heat, flow rate can be varied over a considerable range and the temperature will remain constant. As long as the chamber doesn't run dry, temperature will be nailed to the boiling point of water. And as long as the flow rate is low enough that *some water boils*, the temperature will remain the same.

Jed, this is about the umpteenth time I've repeated this, and others have repeated it as well. Boiling water regulates temperature, very well. The temperature of boiling water doesn't change no matter how fast I boil, it, as long as there is still water!



i.e., there is nothing about Lewan's report that guarantees that all that water was vaporized.


Nothing except the facts that Lewan reported: water boils at 99 deg C at location, and the outlet was hotter than that. Back pressure is negligible with this device.

If this were true, Jed, then we'd not see exact regulation of the temperature. Oddly, in one of the tests we do see temperature rise above 100 a bit erratically. In that test, the outlet hose was immersed in water, this could have created more back pressure....

As Valkonen points out, and as any elementary textbook shows, that's all you need to know. Rossi is quite right about that. The temperature, atmospheric pressure and the shape of the device guarantee that nearly all the water was vaporized. People who do not understand elementary physics will not agree, but they are wrong.

I have already said far too much on this subject.

That's correct. Jed, you shown enough to demonstrate that, for some very odd reason, difficult for me to understand except that I know this can happen to people when they are distracted, you don't "understand elementary physics," because you are making statement after statement that appears to contradict elementary physics, such as this idea that if there is overflow water, the temperature of the E-cat will drop.

Why would it drop? After all, water at boiling will carry away less heat than steam at boiling.

In fact, the temperature will remain constant, until and unless there is so much water flowing through that the heating can't raise it all to boiling temperature. In the overflow scenarious I've described, all the water is heating to the boiling point, but beause the heat isn't quite enough to boil it all, some (eventually) overflows. That's minimum overflow. It could actually be almost full overflow, the entire water flow pouring out the hose, and as long as the temperature were raised to the boiling point with just a smidgen more heat, the temperature in the chimney would still be boiling, for the pressure inside. (Notice that if there is overflow, the temperature probe would be immersed in liquid water. You can't tell from temperature if you are in water or in steam at equilibrium with water. If there is any boiling at all, the water and the steam will be at the same temperature.

The idea that the steam was hotter than boiling and was therefore dry is based on an idea that the water is all being boiled as soon as it enters the E-Cat cooling chamber, i.e., the chamber is at higher than boiling temperature. Such a temperature would be very difficult to control, it would rise substantially above boiling, not just a fraction of a degree.... The very stable temperature seen in most of the plots is a sure sign that this is wet steam or steam and water in equilibrium.

Reply via email to