On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 200W from the hose Maybe. > and 200W from the e cat structure, at lest. I don't believe it. Rossi never claims it, and this 200W would figure in his power calculation (the losses in the hose don't), and he never takes account of it. I'll go with 50 W tops from the ecat. > 100Watt > to heat the water 0.3g/s. Rossi claimed 2 g/s, corresponding to 600W. But I also suspect that was misrepresented, although maybe not by that much > So, if the output looked like a 800W steam from a stove > This is a pretty lame observation to base such a revolutionary claim on. The visual estimate of power in steam is very subjective. I would say, what comes out of that hose is consistent with much less power than that; maybe 200 - 300 W. > we have 500W of excess power. There is enough wiggle room in all those estimates to get zero, and anyway 500W is pretty weak soup after Rossi announced 10 kW reactors.
