"It's a very strange method of control." Damed straight it is. Something appears very wrong. The evidence shows-up in Levi's original report (test #1) showing the device operating in the first quadrant where an increase in input heat energy generates an increase in reaction heat. A decrease in input energy has resulted in a decrease in reation rate.
Look at the dimp in the temperature in the second experiment. Levi is a sloppy physicist, but not so sloppy we won't eventially decipher his garbled report. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>wrote: > At 07:27 AM 7/22/2011, Robert Leguillon wrote: > >> http://evworld.com/press/e-**cat_cutaway.jpg<http://evworld.com/press/e-cat_cutaway.jpg> >> >> Two heaters. The internal heater makes sense for bringing up the Ni-H to >> operating temperatures (and, presumably, keep it there). It's the purpose of >> the external heater that's puzzling. >> > > How authoritative is that drawing? It's from Passerini, and is labeled > "speculative rendering." This is no source at all for the structure. > > The external heater would rapidly raise the coolant to boiling, thus > expediting turn-on. It's a very strange method of control.
