No comments?? If you don't know where to find the report by Dr. G. Levi look here,
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/H-Ni_Fusion/join This Yahoo group has become my own personal blog and rant about this fiasco. I have included first-hand reports and video evidence under the "Files" and "Links" selections appearing in the left-hand column as have seen fit to include. On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Damon Craig <decra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Make that TEST#2. Notice the divot in the temperature curve. > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Damon Craig <decra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "It's a very strange method of control." >> >> Damed straight it is. Something appears very wrong. The evidence shows-up >> in Levi's original report (test #1) showing the device operating in the >> first quadrant where an increase in input heat energy generates an increase >> in reaction heat. A decrease in input energy has resulted in a decrease in >> reation rate. >> >> Look at the dimp in the temperature in the second experiment. Levi is a >> sloppy physicist, but not so sloppy we won't eventially decipher his garbled >> report. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax < >> a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: >> >>> At 07:27 AM 7/22/2011, Robert Leguillon wrote: >>> >>>> http://evworld.com/press/e-**cat_cutaway.jpg<http://evworld.com/press/e-cat_cutaway.jpg> >>>> >>>> Two heaters. The internal heater makes sense for bringing up the Ni-H >>>> to operating temperatures (and, presumably, keep it there). It's the >>>> purpose >>>> of the external heater that's puzzling. >>>> >>> >>> How authoritative is that drawing? It's from Passerini, and is labeled >>> "speculative rendering." This is no source at all for the structure. >>> >>> The external heater would rapidly raise the coolant to boiling, thus >>> expediting turn-on. It's a very strange method of control. >> >> >
