----- Original Message ----- > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/NET370.shtml > Harry
Quite a lot to absorb! The Randall Apx 1 : http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3706appendixa1.shtml http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/img/Randall-Steam-Water-Outflow-70.jpg doesn't make any sense. The thermometer (through the instrument port) would have to be under water -- which was one of the things Mats Lewan DID check. I'm not sure you'd get ANY steam in that configuration. (He should have used a tarollo water diversion fake!)
