I think that 1MW plant will just sit there and generates the steam. But that single module test is where accurate calorimetry is done and also where hidden wires and hidden chemical energy sources are excluded.
That is, scientific validation will be done with single module and 1MW plant is there just for headlines in mass media, to show that this technology is immediately ready for commercial production. Fleischmann & Pons were still decade away from commercialization when they announced the pressconference. Now perhaps Rossi wanted to avoid this mistake and thought that it is good idea to introduce this technology to public when he has commercially ready prototype in hands. But I am glad to hear your status update of BLP. I was quite sure that free energy scheme was there only to raise money for Mills' own controversial hydrino theory research. As there is genuine research behind BLP, it should be safe to raise money without fear of legal problems. If he goes also for public soon, the world economy will turn upside down in 2012! —Jouni On Aug 24, 2011 10:03 PM, "Peter Gluck" <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good ideas Jouni! > Do you have some scheme imagined for how will the 330 > generators linked and how the global parameters will be measured? > Peter > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com >wrote: > >> Quite simply, 1MW demo will show commersially ready prototype. Single >> modules that were thusfar shown, were just lab prototypes. And also there >> will be also single self-sustaining module tested for accurate calorimetry >> in October. >> >> Was this approach right or wrong, it can be debated. I think that it was >> just wrong approach. In my opinnion Rossi should have opensourced this >> technology back in 2009 when he filed patent application. Now the >> unnecessary delay has cost to global economy hundreds of teradollars and >> probably one record breaking oil catastrophe. They tried to drill oil from >> difficult and expensive source that was justified because the oil price >> remained high because E-Cat was not opensourced. >> >> —Jouni >> On Aug 24, 2011 4:54 PM, "Peter Gluck" <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > My dear friends, >> > >> > I have just published: >> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/08/anticipating-1mw-demo.html >> > and I ask you to take in consideration what I am asking there. It can >> > be useful to find out e.g. how will this demo be better thank the >> > experiments >> > done with individual E-cats. >> > Thank you! >> > Peter >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dr. Peter Gluck >> > Cluj, Romania >> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
