Good catch. Yes I've commented about how I dtested this method of weighing
before. I seem to have forgotten how he did it but I can see it is prone to
inaccuracy. He only fills it to 20 bars. He'd have to buy me many dinners to
convince me of this. All in all the rest of the report is sloppy or full on
inconsistencies. A seemingly bad temperature measurement shows up. He admits
to water overflow. He guesses about the 130 degree temperature. The curreny
number seems to bounce around from 11A to .11A even when the power is off
but most glaringly he attributes what is clearly thermal inertia to CF in so
many words!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Man on Bridges" <manonbrid...@aim.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat news at Nyteknik
Hi,
On 14-9-2011 15:05, Joe Catania wrote:
I have to laugh at the hydrogen weight measurement in the Nyteknik
Preliminary Report. The report a 2.7 gram drop in weight after filling
with hydrogen. But an average air molecule weighs about 28 whereas
hydrogen at 60 bar weighs 120 so you should see a gain.
It seems you misunderstood the term "filling".
It means filling the Rossi rector and NOT the Hydrogen bottle.
These numbers apply to the Hydrogen bottle only and not the Rossi reactor.
So filling in this case means removing or better said using from the
bottle of Hydrogen.
Kind regards,
MoB
