>From Catania: > For once? I only been saying that one thing- many times. But you'd better > understand that from first principles not from a typo. > >> From: Jed Rothwell >> Okay, that's probably a typo, as shown in the video. For once >> Catania is correct. The temperature did not drop suddenly and >> then rise. I expect it did drop soon, given the loss of 2.5 kW input >> at a flow rate of 185 ml/min. > >> See my message "Video time synced to real time." I will confirm >> this with Lewan.
It has been a constant observation of mine that when Mr. Rothwell's has suspected a potential mistake or perhaps a "typo" in published data he has been quick to express his suspicions. Jed often quickly seeks to correct previous assumptions, even if it contradicts previous assessments he may have made. Meanwhile, I noticed that Mr. Catania's response to Mr. Rothwell's retraction appears to hinge on assuming a position of superiority by challenging Jed - such that Jed had better understand the "first principals". The implication I derive from Mr. Catania's response is that he does not often seem to consider the possibility that his own crafted assessments might occasionally be prone to similar mistakes. I could say something about that, such as: we are only human. Some more than others. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
