What was personally communicated to me by JR is, of course, beyond SVJ's
ken. You seem to keen to overllok data which shows up the obvious flaw in
your CF bias.
----- Original Message -----
From: "OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson" <svj.orionwo...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat news at Nyteknik
From Catania:
For once? I only been saying that one thing- many times. But you'd better
understand that from first principles not from a typo.
From: Jed Rothwell
Okay, that's probably a typo, as shown in the video. For once
Catania is correct. The temperature did not drop suddenly and
then rise. I expect it did drop soon, given the loss of 2.5 kW input
at a flow rate of 185 ml/min.
See my message "Video time synced to real time." I will confirm
this with Lewan.
It has been a constant observation of mine that when Mr. Rothwell's
has suspected a potential mistake or perhaps a "typo" in published
data he has been quick to express his suspicions. Jed often quickly
seeks to correct previous assumptions, even if it contradicts previous
assessments he may have made.
Meanwhile, I noticed that Mr. Catania's response to Mr. Rothwell's
retraction appears to hinge on assuming a position of superiority by
challenging Jed - such that Jed had better understand the "first
principals". The implication I derive from Mr. Catania's response is
that he does not often seem to consider the possibility that his own
crafted assessments might occasionally be prone to similar mistakes.
I could say something about that, such as: we are only human. Some
more than others.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
