*Incrustation is a problem in this circuit.* DGT said they use organic heat transfer agents in this closed circuit. This is a problem of good control. (read please my previous posting predicting the outcome of the Oct experiment.
I have NOT told thta the heat comes from some chemistry. I think it comes from the same reactions as described by Piantelli in his Pontignano Poster. I have not the slightest idea what know the Defkalion people or what they do now, but discussions with them lead to the conclusion thta thay have good engineers- what Rosi is not and if he has some, is not interested in their advices. Peter On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> i have tried to describe my opinion re the latest Rossi event here: >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/10/seven-skinny-e-cats-eating-seven-fat.html >> >> > This says: > > "- the primary steam hot water circuit was open and this can mean that the > E-cats still cannot work with internal recirculation-as it was promoted by > Defkalion;" > > This is wrong on two counts: > > 1. There is no evidence that Rossi could not recirculate the condensate if > he wanted to. There are no physical limitations or problems that would > prevent it. However, as I pointed out, it would be a little tricky and > a nuisance, so why bother? Doing it is just a matter of engineering. > Frankly, I do not see what difference it makes. It reduces the recovery > rate, but so what? Even if you assume the recovery rate was 100% and the > reaction produced only 38 MJ, there is no chance this was from chemistry or > stored heat. That is ruled out by a wide margin. Whether the margin is a > factor of 3, or 10, or a million does not make the slightest bit of > difference. Obviously he could have run longer and extended this margin > indefinitely. > > 2. Claims made by Rossi have no connection with those made by Defkalion. > Just because you think Rossi cannot recirculate, you have no basis whatever > to conclude that Defkalion cannot. > > There has been a lot of confusion about this. In the Defkalion on-line > forum, many people asked about claims made by Rossi, or challenged these > claims. The people at Defkalion did not respond. They were not evading the > issue. They know nothing about these claims. > > Rossi reportedly transferred the technology to Defkalion, showing them how > to make the nickel power, the cells and other components, and how to control > the device. He did not transfer to them his oddball methods of doing > calorimetry or his test techniques. They use conventional methods and > instruments. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
