Newton's Law is irrelevant. Your the type of buffoon who believes that since
there's an Ohms LAw every conductor obeys it. The temperature "law" the e-cat
obeys is ostensibly written in the temperature data if we can consider that
valid. Whether that confirms its Newton's Law or notr is not relevant to the
dubunking of the CF myth. Cf is not being assumed and since it hasn't been
shown we are correct in not assuming it. You still aren't able to show me the
temperature data you say exists and is increasing.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Look at the BIG PICTURE and you will see this is
irrefutable proof
Joe Catania <zrosumg...@aol.com> wrote:
That appears to be a graph of power noy yemperature.
It is derived from Lewan's temperature readings. The flow rate was unchanged
so correspondence to the temperature is unchanged for the entire dataset. In
other words, you could replace the vertical axis power numbers with the
corresponding temperatures and it would look exactly the same.
If its passive cooling? Excuse me but are we discussing something here?
You claim the heat comes from heat storage with no input power. That would
mean it is passive cooling, by definition. It has to follow Newton's law of
cooling. That is how heat storage and release works. You keep talking about
thermal inertia. I suggest you learn what that is, how it works, and what laws
of physics govern it.
- Jed
