The previous tests were done, if not perfectly, then at least with care enough 
to demonstrate massive excess heat. Since the big plant is just a lot of small 
ecats thrown together, what point to Rossi would there have been? He was making 
a sale, not impressing his neighbors, or us. That he even threw this open to 
(as it turns out disinterested) reporters is amazing. The customer (NATO or 
NASA?) wanted to remain secret. If I'm selling something, the customer is 
always right!

I think many people are projecting their own expectations onto Rossi. He's not 
a scientist, or even a hardcore engineer at this point. He's the lead sales 
tech for his company. Perhaps one day he'll hire another person to take over 
this role and he can get back to engineering and study. But without capital 
from sales, that's going to be hard.

-drl

----------------------------------------------
"I write a little. I erase a lot." - Chopin



--- On Tue, 11/1/11, Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote:

From: Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi 1MW : Why is the energy hidden behind pressboard?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2011, 3:26 AM


  

    
  
  
    Am 01.11.2011 09:19, schrieb Danny Ross Lunsford:
    
      
        
          
            Who cares what it's
              behind?? Maybe he doesn't want people getting burned! Most
              machinery has some form of idiot fence around it!

              

              I find it amazing that people seize on the tiniest
              details, like a matron dissatisfied with her curtains.

              

            
          
        
      
    
    This is not a tiny detail. This is the final result. Arent you aware
    about this?

    From beginning on I was mostly interested in this, because anything
    else of importance - the steam is made invisible.

    Had he documented the airflow and temperatures in a credible way or
    had he used an industrial cooler that has known calibration data,
    then the energy would have been proven almost irrefutable.

  

Reply via email to