Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> wrote:
> If you spent an hour or so looking at what I actually provided instead of > generating arm waving non quantitative babble then you might gain some > understanding. > It is not arm waving to point out that THERE IS NO CONCRETE in the reactor. None. You are wasting your time speculating about how this might work, because people have look inside these reactors and they saw no concrete. Are you postulating there is invisible concrete? The device weighed 98 kg. The metal boxes are sheet metal. You think a > couple sheet metal boxes, a few pipe fittings and the bolts weigh 98 kg or > even 50 kg? To me this makes no sense. > Evidently you forgot the thing has lead sheets in it. It DOES have lead. It DOES NOT have concrete. Got it? - Jed
