> > > Krivit seems to have good contacts who are willing to talk to him, >> including some at the U of Bologna and U of Uppsala and many scientists who >> work in cold fusion and LENR. >> > > So do I. As far as I know, the people in Bologna and Uppsala have been > telling Krivit just the opposite of what he is reporting. See, for example, > the abstract from Kullander's upcoming lecture. >
Really? You'd think those misquoted people would complain! Why don't you interview them yourself and publish the truth of what they had to say. Abstract of Kullander's lecture? I read it and I have no idea what you mean. I doubt the lecture itself will be glowing praise for Rossi but seeing what K has done thus far, I suppose it's possible. I think it will be optimistic (wildly more than it should) but I suspect Kullander will be cautious and will say that he really wishes Rossi would allow independent tests. Anyway, what are we referring to? Krivit said, IRRC, that nobody at U of U or UBO is associated in any way with Rossi officially and what they do and say about him is on their own. Also that none will claim that they have received a device from Rossi? Isn't that true? What did I miss here? What did Krivit say about the U's that's wrong or opposite of what the people there say? Which people? What do they say *officially* about Rossi? How about unofficially? I have yet to see a single endorsement of Rossi from either U. And of course no data either.
