"This one is for you to explain. You always complain about the lack of data. If you think about the system long enough, I am confident you will understand why."
That's an answer? Yes, please, by all means clarify. ">(1) why is the temperature so stable, requiring power stability of 1% Easy. The water level is adjusting. No requirement of 1% exists. Lets argue this point in a separate posting if you wish." I wish you two would. That would be educational. M. Y. *------- On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:15 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > I already did. Do you need clarification? > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Nov 18, 2011 12:35 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Right, because no one can explain: >> >> (1) why is the temperature so stable, requiring power stability of 1% >> (2) how does he get an 8-fold increase in power transfer in a few >> minutes, if the first-fold power increase took 2 hours. >> > > Excellent questions. Perhaps Jed Rothwell can address them? > >
