Hank Mills 

November 21st, 2011 at 11:24 PM 
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=1#comment-126865> 

Cremating Thermal Inertia With A Custom E-Cat Test 




... 



— text box — 

1) Put two E-Cat modules of the same design side by side. Any design of module 
could be used, as long as they were each of the same model of E-Cat. 

2) Fill the first module (A) with hydrogen under the highest SAFE pressure 
possible, high enough so that the self-sustain mode would be particularly 
robust. 

3) Fill the second module (B) with ordinary atmosphere. The reactor could would 
contain the “charge” (nickel, catalyst, etc), but no hydrogen. This would be 
the “control” unit, that would produce no excess energy. 

4) Setup both systems so that each would receive the exact same electrical 
input, and the same flow rate of water. Use appropriate methods to measure the 
electrical input, and the flow of water throughout the test. 

5) Place thermocouples at the inlet of each reactor, inside of each reactor, 
and in the water (air or steam) exiting each reactor (the output). 

6) Start logging the temperatures via an automatic data collection system, and 
turn on the electric resistors in both module (A) and (B). 

7) Once it is absolutely certain (no doubt) that self sustain mode has “took” 
in module (A) which contains hydrogen, turn off the resistors in both module 
(A) and (B). Then turn on the radio frequency generator in both modules. 

8)Keep recording data. During this time period module (A) in self sustain mode 
should output a continual flow of liquid water or steam, that maintains a 
fairly constant temperature, or actually rises in temperature. However, the 
output from the control module (B) — with no hydrogen — should quickly drop in 
temperature. 

9) Keep the test going for as long as practically possible, to show that long 
after the control module has stopped emitting heat, the module with hydrogen is 
continually producing a steady output. 

— text box — 




[ I coulda sworn I posted a similar protocol here ... except in time-series, 
not parallel] 




Rossi let it past moderation, but didn't reply to it.

Reply via email to