I agree Horace. This is pathetic. Dave
-----Original Message----- From: Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 1:45 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test On Nov 28, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Mary Yugo wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: Yes, I will sign up too. Alan we miss the bandwagon. I guess Mary is taking all the money. G You can have the Rossi business. I'm concentrating on debunking Hugh Deasy's antigravity machine. Boeing is paying me -- they'd be out of business if Deasy's machine could power airplanes. Deasy was (maybe still is) a vocal Steorn supporter. Deasy, who has an extensive education and an excellent job and should know better, does stuff like this supposed antigravity device: http://www.youtube.com/user/steornhugh#p/u/6/IWSl7P1iitQ This is his blog! http://hdeasy.blogspot.com/2009/12/steorn-demo-in-few-days.html That is so stupid I can't believe it. I have a commercially available toy robot bug that works using 6 vibrating legs, but moves 10 times as fast. Anybody ever heard of the difference between sliding and static friction? Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
