On Nov 29, 2011, at 8:48 PM, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 22:49, Horace Heffner wrote:
In 2007 I converted Jemimenko's theory into a full isomorphism
between the laws of electromagnetism and the laws of
gravimagnetism. Creating this isomorphism involves the use of the
imaginary number i in gravimagnetic terms, and thus the potential
addition of 3 dimensions to any theory of everything. For a quick
synopsis see:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CosmicSearch.pdf
Hey Horace,
What role does the 'i' play in the geometry, or is this an entirely
algebraic approach?
Joe
It is a practical approach. It makes many things work
automatically. This was explained in detail on pages 7 and 8 of:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FullGravimag.pdf
Jefimenko developed a causal theory of gravity, based on retardation,
but he had to manually determine the sign in each formula. This was
due to he fact he made epsilon and mu negative in his gravitomagnetic
theory. This he deemed necessary in order for the force directions
to come out right in the Coulomb force analog equations, i.e. it
denotes an attracting force for like charges, as opposed to the
Coulomb force which is attracting for unlike charges. This required
him to either place a special sign in various equations, or to
reverse the order of cross products, as in the Poynting vector
equation, S = (1/mu_g) K x g. Note that he reversed the K and g,
analogs to E and B in electromagnetic theory. This has the effect of
applying a negative sign to the formula. The use of the factor i in
gravimagnetic terms eliminates the manual sign placing and permits a
full isomorphism between the two sets of laws, an isomorphism the
existence of which has been commonly sensed by physicists for over a
century, but not to my knowledge ever fully developed or specified.
The similarity of the two sets of laws is self evident, but there are
differences with respect to signs and constants. I took a very
simple step, but one which has far reaching implications which are
testable.
The link between QM and quantum gravity I see as primarily in the
fact that h_g = -h, a relationship I derived in 2007 using the
isomorphism on pages 14 and 15 of:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FullGravimag.pdf
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
