Hi…corrected spelling
Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation than ordinary protons? (Especially if that coherence is limited to pairs). I am reading this paper to try and figure out what is talking about. Adiabatic entanglement transport in Rydberg aggregates http://www.citebase.org/fulltext?format=application%2Fpdf&identifier=oai%3AarXiv.org%3A1104.2416 I think it says as follows… Ultra-strong dipole interactions enable Rydberg ensembles to stimulate and transform the quantum dynamics of other long-range interacting systems. In our case: the Rossi Reaction vessel, high order Rydberg hydrogen matter has a huge dipole moment as aggregated through a possible ensemble of 100 atoms. A single Rydberg atom has a dipole moment 100 times greater than an ordinary atom because the electron is in an extremely large and far removed circular orbit. The entire 100 atom crystal may have a coherent aggregate dipole moment 11 orders of magnitude greater than an ordinary atom. The range of this Rydberg aggregate is very long at about a few microns. This Rydberg matter imposes a quantum blockade effect on free cooper pairs of protons which tend to get many such pairs into the same quantum state. IOW, the strong Rydberg interactions in these aggregates lead to coherently delocalized entangled states in other external quantum systems (proton pairs). When a crystal of Rydberg matter floats in range of a micro particle, it may be that all the protons in a micron sized Rossi particle are all entangled in the same quantum state superposition. Best regards, Axil On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi… > > > > Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation > than > > ordinary protons? (Especially if that coherence is limited to pairs). > > I am reading this paper to try and figure out what is taking about. > > Adiabatic entanglement transport in Rydberg aggregates > > > http://www.citebase.org/fulltext?format=application%2Fpdf&identifier=oai%3AarXiv.org%3A1104.2416 > > I think it says as follows… > > Ultra-strong dipole interactions enable Rydberg ensembles to simulate the > quantum dynamics of other long-range interacting systems. > > > > In our case: the Rossi Reaction vessel, high order Rydberg hydrogen matter > has a huge dipole moment as aggregated through a possible ensemble of 100 > atoms. > > > > A single Rydberg atom has a dipole moment 100 times greater than an > ordinary atom because the electron is in an extremely large and far removed > circular orbit. > > > > This Rydberg matter imposes a quantum blockade effect on free cooper pairs > of protons which tend to get many such pair into the same quantum state. > > > > IOW, the strong Rydberg interactions in these aggregates lead to > coherently delocalized entangled states in other external quantum systems > (proton pairs). > > > > When a crystal of Rydberg matter floats in range of a micro particle, it > may be that all the protons in a micron sized Rossi particle are all > entangled in the same quantum state superposition. > > > > Best regards, > > Axil > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:35 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:21:38 -0500: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >In this low temperature lattice case, coulomb shielding from the ultra >> >strong dipole moments of Rydberg matter produced by the internal heater >> >will still occur and cold fusion will still result in a cold lattice. But >> >in this case, large amounts of unthermalized gamma radiation will be >> >released because there will be no coherent protons to thermalize that >> >radiation. >> [snip] >> Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation >> than >> ordinary protons? (Especially if that coherence is limited to pairs). >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >
