How come Mary Yugo explanations of the "current events" sounds always the most rational, well thought and coherent? It just fits all the facts. Giovanni
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Defkalion's responses have a highly Steornish flavor. They are > tangential. Evasive. I doubt it's a language problem. > > The most likely reason Defkalion answers Jed the way they do is that they > depended on Rossi's word and his delivery of technology which never > happened. My best guess is that it didn't happen for only one reason: > Rossi had nothing which would stand up to detailed scrutiny so he created > the conflict with Defkalion in order to postpone his exposure as long as > possible. That is perhaps also the reason why his *only* client is > anonymous. Why else would Rossi break with the one company that could have > helped him efficiently and relatively safely market his E-cats and develop > the technology? > > Continuing my theory, for unfathomable reasons, Defkalion may have pressed > on without Rossi's core, claiming they developed one of their own. > Really? How? And in such a short time? Most likely Defkalion also has > nothing. Certainly, they have shown nothing and best as I can determine > have never made promised arrangements for government tests or any other > tests or visits. All of those were supposed to happen in Q4 2011 or > earlier. And the delays, if that's what's going on, have not even been > acknowledged or explained by Defkalion. > > IMO, both Rossi and Defkalion are simply bluffing and delaying, maybe > hoping they will be able to develop the technology, whatever that turns out > to be. Steorn, Dennis Lee, Carl Tilley and Sniffex, all had no exit plan > and neither, it seems, does Mark Goldes. It doesn't seem as if Eestor and > BLP do either. With time, either the perpetrators get in trouble with the > law or if not, the claims and interest in them just fade out. Perhaps > Rossi and Defkalion don't have exit plans either. Maybe both are playing > the current game of words by ear. > >
