In this case we have to give Jed some slack. What he described is what he was told by a persons he trusts as competent. And what Jed was told is that an initial fist visit was done and everything seems to be ok and as advertised. It is just an initial, first inspection in preparation for a more throughout testing. This is more than what we had before where we were not even sure there was a facility at all. It is not a validation of anything but a promise that a validation is planned. That is all. We will have to wait for the real testing of course. The problem with all these e-cat stories is that promises are made all the time and then regularly broken. Based on what we have experienced so far I make a prediction that also this promise will be broken. I would be glad to be wrong. Giovanni
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Any idea WHEN your consultant might do some tests? >> > > Soon, I hope. > > > >> How can an "independent in-depth evaluation lasting several days" NOT >> involve doing tests? > > > It is what engineers call a "site visit" meaning a formal evaluation or > planning session made in preparation for doing tests. Perhaps I did not > make that clear. > > > What did they do all day for several days? Talk about the great future >> of products that have never been shown, tested or proven? > > > He examined the machines, the laboratory equipment, their data, and their > detailed specifications, and he wrote a formal document spelling out > proposed tests, in preparation for doing a comprehensive test with outside > equipment, and outside experts. > > - Jed > >
