On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Akira Shirakawa wrote: > > Do you mean that this person actually went there an examined the machines >> in person? Sorry if I'm being picky here. Just want to be 100% sure. >> > > Yup, that's what I mean. Also tons of data from the machines. The data was > collected by Defkalion's equipment. The next step is collect similar data > with independent test equipment. > > Data is more fun than machines. If I were there I would probably turn my > back to the machine and spend the whole time poring over data. That's what > programmers do. I spent two weeks at Mizuno's lab doing that. > I don't know. All the equivocation and pussy footing about is maddening. Why doesn't the guy just say: "I saw what appeared to be a working fusion reactor. I saw data being taken and I examined the transducers and readouts and they seemed legitimate. I looked over the data and it strongly indicated that the device was making at least 10x the input power (or better yet, was running without input power). I checked for and did not see anything to suggest faking or fraud. We did a calibration run and the resulting data supported proper functioning of the measuring equipment. The longest test I saw was four hours but the data collected and submitted for my review suggested that the machine had been running for a week without interruption and with no change in operating parameters. The limitations of these observations are that I could not use my own measuring equipment. Defkalion has a large, well equipped laboratory with a substantial number of busy technicians and researchers. Those I talked to seemed knowledgeable and competent. Next door to the lab is a large factory under construction that appears compatible with a manufacturing plant for thermal generator devices. Within the lab area, there was lots of late model test equipment, a high vacuum facility, and a well equipped large stock room. " There. Was that so difficult or revealing of secrets? What? Nobody speaks English clearly any more? We need bureaucratese equivocations instead?
