You can learn more about Randell Mills's (of Blacklight Power) theory on my website - in particular I'm including some text from it as shown below which can also be seen at this link:
http://zhydrogen.com/?page_id=350/#FineStrucPart2-rmenu My goal from the website was to explain some of the basics of Mill's theory - I think eventually it will be accepted as fact. I'm also setting up an experiment to verify Mills's claims as can be seen here: http://zhydrogen.com/?page_id=620 Basically a high energy photon's first step towards becoming matter happens at orbitstate n = 1/137.05999679 which Mills terms the "transition state orbitsphere". There is a connection between potential energy, the rest mass of the electron, the speed of light and Einsteins mass/energy equation E = mc^2: ============== The following three questions are based on an initially stationary electron at an infinite distance from a proton that is then captured by the proton (because objects with opposite charges attract each other) and ends up at orbit state n = 1/137.05999679 (i.e. n = alpha where alpha equals the fine structure constant which also equals 0.007296 ) Question 1: What is the electron's orbit velocity when it reaches orbit state n = 1/137.05999679 ? Answer: The electron’s orbit velocity v equals c, the speed of light (299792458 m/s). Question 2: What is the change in potential energy of the electron as it “falls” from n = infinity to n = 1/137.05999679 ? Answer: -510998.896 eV, which is exactly equal to the negative of the rest mass of the electron in terms of electron volt (eV) units. Question 3: What is the sum of the following two energies when the electron falls from orbit state n = infinity to n = 1/137.05999679 ? 1. energy radiated by the electron as it spirals down to n = 1/137.05999679 plus 2. kinetic energy of electron at n = 1/137.05999679 Answer: The sum of these two energies equals 510998.896 eV (because both components are equal to 255499.448 eV) which is exactly equal to the known rest mass of the electron. On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:34:04 -0800: > Hi, > > alpha*c is the speed you get for the electron in a Bohr orbit, utilizing the > De > Broglie wavelength. What is not apparent from the snippet quoted is why this > velocity follows from a "screw type of motion". > >>Might I suggest all Not Off Topic (i.e., technical, aka, ‘signal’) postings >>use NOT in the subject line to make them more obvious to those who care not >>to waste bandwidth on the personal aspects of the Rossi saga… >> >>In my latest session of ‘serendipitous surfing’, I was scanning a PDF of the >>document in the Ref: section below, and noticed this little bit of text and >>the accompanying calculation: >>============================== >>“This screw type of motion obviously is optional and let us suppose that it >>corresponds to the electron motion in Bohr atom at orbit a0 with energy of >>13.6 eV. Then the axial velocity is: >> >> v = (e^2) / ( 2*h*epsilon_sub_0 ) >> = alpha*c >> = 2.18769e6 m/s (3) >> >>where: >>e = charge of electron, >>h = Planck constant, >>c = speed of light, >>alpha = fine structure constant >>============================== >> >>Now what struck me was the result, 2.188e6 m/s. >>This is exactly twice the constant in Znidarsic’s work, 1.094e6 Hz.m >>Any connection? >> >>Frank, does this make sense to you? >> >>-Mark >> >>Ref: >>Theoretical Feasibility of Cold Fusion According to the BSM - >>Supergravitation Unified Theory >>Stoyan Sarg Sargoytchev >>York University, Toronto, Canada >>E-mail: [email protected] >> > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >
