Widom - Larsen advocate, Steven Krivit, recently published three articles, two of which were either authored by Lewis Larsen, or contained references to Larsen's theory. The third article is an index compiled by Krivit pertaining to his on-going attempt to undermine the legitimacy of McKubre's "M4" work.
See: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/01/31/index-for-investigation-of-mckubre s-m4-experiment-created/ http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/01/17/prescient-1994-insights-from-fleis chmann-pons-and-preparata-on-lenr-theory/ http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/01/31/index-for-investigation-of-mckubre s-m4-experiment-created/ I've made it a point to clearly state that, in my opinion, Mr. Krivit has established himself to be an ADVOCATE for the Widom Larsen camp. I bring this up because Mr. Krivit at one time personally told me that he didn't want to be perceived as an ADVOCATE. An ADVOCATE, however, promotes a particular theory or cause while simultaneously undermining opposing causes and theories. In my view, Mr. Krivit continues to show a propensity to give the Widom-Larsen camp free reign to say whatever they want to say at NET. Meanwhile, Mr. Krivit also shows a propensity to attack the credibility of those who may be perceived as competition, or simply beg to differ with the position of the W-L camp. This suggests to me that Mr. Krivit doesn't really understand what his actual intentions are. When will Mr. Krivit come out of the closet and clarify to his readers what kind of relationship he has established with the Widom-Larsen camp? I think Mr. Krivit's readership deserves to know his intentions. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
