I have been very patient with all of this. I was willing to wait until March 31, and even then I wouldn't consider it 100% fraud with no tests. Rossi is a liar if he doesn't even look into conducting a test with Smith, and there is no reason to believe anything he says with no proof. On Feb 15, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Robert Leguillon wrote:
> From Jarold: > /snip/ > "and what does that say about Defkalion who is only in the LENR business > because of Rossi. If no valid tests are performed by either group by March > 31, this whole thing is most likely a fraud." > /snip/ > > "Defkalion GT was not invited and did not participate officially in any > public demonstration nor the preparation of any other third party's public > event related to LENR devises [sic], since 17th of January 2011." > (http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=258&p=3300#p3300) > When Rossi allegedly failed to meet contractual requirements, Defkalion went > silent. As the relationship was severed, between July to October of 2011, > they weren't releasing any information. These are the expected actions of > someone reassessing their lot. > The impression that I get (baseless speculation) is that Rossi may have > misled Defkalion as to his success with Ni-H, and his alleged catalyst. But, > possibly, his core idea of using micro/nano nickel was indeed a breakthrough. > When Defkalion pushed forward on their own, they may have found a way to get > reliable, controllable, excess heat. > Their silence-then-reemergence is interesting. Where Rossi's past may be > entirely consistent with that of someone profiting from outrageous claims, > the named Defkalion directors do not strike me as a group of con-artists. If > the scenario really were that they were "victims of a con", what are the odds > that they could all be brought on board to perpetuate the scam? These are > former chairmen, presidents, and even an ambassador. > > Aside from a few photos/videos, there has been no evidence that Defkalion > does, or does not have the technology. Inviting people inside, and promising > upcoming independent testing, are great signs that they believe they do. It > is wrong to place arbitrary time frames on what appears to be a more reasoned > approach. They are not obligated to provide us with anything, but they seem > to understand that there is a wall of doubt to overcome. Moreover, they > finally seem ready to address those doubts. They've even claimed that most > of third party tests will be streamed on the Internet, if the testers agree > (http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=926&start=200). > > Patience. > > R.L.
