There is absolutely no excuse why Rossi wouldn't accept this offer. I was sitting on the fence with Rossi, but now I'm leaning more towards him being a fraud. It is a million dollars for a simple test. It would be a much better use of his time than writing about snakes and clowns on his blog. Rossi also wants people to buy the e-cat before they test it. Does anyone see the problem with that? With 13 sales, he supposedly has $26 million. He had to sell his house to have enough money for the e-cat. Unless he is getting a large cash infusion from his secret partners, he could easily use a million dollars. He still needs to run a lot more public tests if he expects to sell a million e-cats. I don't know why he'd trust customers to test it with their protocols, but not an independent test with testing procedures accepted by him. This makes no sense whatsoever. What if the customer buys it, steals his ideas, and makes their own e-cat to run Rossi out of business? And what happened to his 1 MW customer who wasn't supposed to be secret. Shouldn't we have heard something about that by now? Rossi is looking more like a fraud everyday, and what does that say about Defkalion who is only in the LENR business because of Rossi. If no valid tests are performed by either group by March 31, this whole thing is most likely a fraud. On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Gigi DiMarco wrote:
> I think Rossi is adding to English more words, coming in some sense from > Italian, than in the last 5 centuries. > Clownerie has been translated by Akira into travesty. Clownerie is another > Rossi's invention, if I can imagine what take places into his brain I think > the right path is clown ==> pagliaccio ==> pagliacciata (the act of being a > clown) ==> clownerie; I think it should be translated into buffoonery > (clowning, silly behaviour) > > 2012/2/14 Chemical Engineer <cheme...@gmail.com> > > > Smith Offers $1 Million Prize for Successful E-Cat Demo > by Steven B. Krivit > > From: Margot Egan [on behalf of Dick Smith] > Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:51 PM > To: Andrea Rossi Re. E-CAT > Subject: from Dick Smith in Australia Re. U.S. One Million Dollars for > Successful Re-Testing of E-CAT > > To: Andrea Rossi > From: Dick Smith > > Dear Mr Rossi > > Re: USD1,000,000 for Successful Repeat of E-CAT Demonstration > > Dick Smith is my name. I am writing to you from Sydney, Australia. Possibly > the best information in relation to my background is on Wikipedia - see HERE. > > Some time ago I was contacted by Mr Sol Millin of the Byron New Energy Trust. > Mr Millin has had extensive communication with you. Mr Millin communicated > the advantages of your ECAT unit in relation to energy and how it had the > potential to solve the world’s energy problems. Mr Millin said that he had > your authority to act on your behalf in relation to an agreement for the > Australian “rights” to your invention. > > After some discussion, I agreed that I would invest AUD200,000 provided that > evidence could be shown that the unit actually worked as claimed. > > There has been a lot of to’ing-and-fro’ing since then, with Mr Millin > claiming that he has provided me with the evidence and with my insistence > that this is not the case. > > At one stage Mr Millin even sent me an email (attached) threatening to sue me > for one-hundred-million-dollars if I did not proceed with sending him my > AUD200,000. > > As Mr Millin and I do not seem to be getting anywhere on this issue, I have > determined a way that we could possibly break this nexus, i.e. I would like > to offer you USD1,000,000 for a successful repeat of the March 29, 2011 > demonstration. > > One million US dollars will be made out to you as a Bank cheque or will be > held in an escrow account if you desire. I do not want to know how the unit > operates, nor to have a share in the profits from any sales. My satisfaction > will come from knowing that if the unit is successful, then some of the > world’s greatest problems – especially in relation to climate change – will > be solved. > > I point out that over the last few decades my wife and I have donated many > millions of dollars to scientific research, much of it without any immediate > results. We have not complained about this. > > My offer is very simple, which I will restate: I ask you to repeat the March > 29, 2011 demonstration purported to show that your E-CAT unit had an output > power of many times the input power through LENR (low energy nuclear > reactions). > > As the sole judges as to whether this can be repeated correctly, I suggest we > use the two Swedish scientists, Kullander and Essen, as they attended the > March 2011 demonstration and wrote a report. I would be happy to cover any > reasonable cost of having them flying to Italy to attend the repeat of the > demonstration. They can then check the wires (because, as you know, there > have been claims that the wiring may have been misconnected) and also the > power output of the unit in relation to both the heated water and the steam. > > I would be happy, with Kullander and Essen as the sole judges as to whether > the unit has the power output you have claimed, to hand you an irrevocable > Bank cheque for USD1,000,000 made out in your name if the demonstration is > successfully completed. If Kullander and Essen are not available, I am happy > to agree with you on two other individuals of similar expertise to attend the > new demonstration as the judges. I am sure we can come to an agreement as to > who would be suitable and independent. It would also be necessary to have a > third person - who you and I can agree on - to assist with the type of > measuring equipment and its accuracy so there are no doubts that the > scientific community will accept the results. > > I understand the 29 March 2011 demonstration took place over a period of more > than six hours and showed a power multiplication of approximately ten times. > To make the demonstration test even fairer, I would be happy if the > demonstration to qualify for the assignment of the USD1,000,000 were reduced > to a five-hour period and with a power multiplication ratio of at least eight > times. This will make it very much easier for you to qualify for the > USD1,000,000, As far as I am concerned, eight times’ power multiplication > through LENRs will solve the world’s power problems for the future. > > Mr Rossi, I believe the advantage of my offer is that you can show the > sceptics (I am presently one of them) that the unit actually works as you > have claimed. I notice that you have had other investors offering very large > amounts of money, and I can understand your concern in relation to this. My > offer is USD1,000,000 without any conditions attached at all in relation to > where you will spend the money. You can use it for further research - > perhaps to re-purchase your house or even donate some of the money to charity. > > Well, there it is. It’s quite simple. Successfully replicate the > demonstration showing the power gain from LENRs of March 29, 2011 with the > two Swedish scientists, Kullander and Essen (or two other individuals we > agree on), and USD1,000,000 will be yours. > > Also, of course, you will receive attention from around the world and a > well-deserved Nobel Laureate. I will consider I have had value for my money > as the person who actually proves that your unit works (or doesn’t) – an > issue which will be resolved for all time. > > My offer is open for you to accept until close of business Monday 20 February > 2012. > I look forward to your reply. > > Yours faithfully > > Dick Smith >
