They made many very specific promises. For example, they stated the results of the Greek certification tests would be revealed "very soon" over a year ago. They also stated that the tests would not take place without the protocols and other information being revealed before the tests. Although they did at one point say something about the results being subject to the testers, they also made statements they have not lived up to. The fact is that they claim to have a top notch, practical technology that is ready for the market. They bragged about this over a year ago at their big press conference. However, they have provided zero evidence of this to the public, despite them saying they would.
At least Rossi allowed a dozen or more tests that clearly demonstrated (in my opinion) he was producing large amounts of excess heat. For example, the 18 hour test performed by Dr. Levi (which produced a constant output of around 15 kilowatts with only around a hundred watts of input) was particularly impressive. Also, the test of the one megawatt plant was also very impressive. Defkalion claims to have improved upon Rossi's technology, but have provided nothing to back up their claims. It's time for Defkalion to apologize, go black, and do their work in total secrecy, or provide some hard data like they have promised. ________________________________ From: Randy Wuller <rwul...@freeark.com> To: noone noone <thesteornpa...@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:49 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green Technologies I don't think they promised what you claim. Results were always subject to publication by the testers not Defkalion. Sent from my iPhone On May 10, 2012, at 8:34 PM, noone noone <thesteornpa...@yahoo.com> wrote: This is absolutely pathetic. We have been promised test data over and over again for over a year, and Defkalion has yet again provide something totally different. In my opinion, this is an insult to all those who have been following them. If they wanted to work in the "dark" they had every opportunity to do so, and share nothing with the public. However, they promised on multiple occasions not only to provide test data, but also data from the certification process, the identities of the testers, protocols for the experiments, and even live webcam footage. Yet again, they have failed to provide any of the MEANINGFUL material they promised to provide. > > >If they were polite, they would apologize for breaking their word, just share >nothing at all from this point on, and go black. I'd rather them do that than >tease and taunt us with a few images with almost no explanation, after >promising us COMPLETE AND FULLY DETAILED TEST DATA WITH LIVE VIDEO! > > > >They need to choose one way or the other, as far as I am concerned. Anything >else is simply rude. > > >(Yes, I realize a private company does not "owe" the public anything, but in >this case we were promised many things on multiple occasions. If they are not >going to keep their word they need to be blunt and tell us, and go black.) > > > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:59 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green Technologies > >At 07:15 PM 5/10/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: >> At 04:42 PM 5/10/2012, ecat builder wrote: >>> Wow. That is a spark plug on that reactor! See Pages 13, 14, 16, 18. >>> Page 18 has a spark plug on the desk. Interesting... >> >> Maybe they preload hydrogen, let in some oxygen and ignite it. Gives a >> very sharp pressure/temperature pulse. > >I thought this was a neat idea for startup until I realized that this would >form water in there, which would then need to be flushed out. I'd think that >gas would not be flowing through an operating device, and consumption of >hydrogen (requiring flow in) would be very low. It could be a lot more >complicated than electrically heating the thing. > > >
