Jojo Jaro,
Axil Axil wrote:
<SNIP>
"A better way to get carbon into the act is to use a hydrocarbon gas instead of vaporizing bulk carbon and hydrogen. Vaporizing bulk carbon is not easy from a practical point of view. In an easier way, without any oxygen in the reactor’s envelop (important), under the action of a spark plug discharge plasma at 60,000C, the hydrocarbon gas would decompose into hydrogen and some sort of carbon dust. This dust may form as carbon nanotubes(a one dimensional superconductive cluster) which would store electrons from the plasma produced by the spark plug. This long thin tube would be superconductive and concentrate negative charge like a capacitor. These nanowires would be electrostatically attracted to the nickel powder, they would attach themselves electrostatically head on to the nickel powder, and their accumulated negative charge at their sharp tip would reduce the coulomb barrier where their sharp tips contacted the nickel powder. This is not the way Rossi’s reaction works, but I think that it is a better way. Rossi’s secret sauce is heat activated to accumulate charge; but the carbon nanotubes accumulate charge in proportion to the discharge rate of the spark plug. If you want to increase heat output on a nanotube based system, just increase the spark plug firing rate. Control of heat output is a simple process with an advantage of simplicity over what Rossi has been struggling with over more than a year. Cheers: Axil"
Putting a money bet on that theory. Will support any one wanting to build a reactor
incorporating this concept.
Physicist
