Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> And yet Brillouin Energy‘s President and Chief Technical Officer Robert E.
> Godes has selflessly posted critical help on Rossi's web site that has
> enabled Rossi to develop his latest reaction approach; and Rossi was
> grateful for it. The same is true for the advice he got from NI and his
> first government based customer.
>
Yup. He is sincere about expressing thanks and giving credit to others.
Effusive, even. Also, unlike many self-made inventors, he is open to ideas
and suggestions from other people. He does not suffer from the "not
invented here" syndrome. One person who knows him better than I do said he
reads everything and he will ask for help from anyone, if he thinks that
will contribute to reaching his goals. I have heard he learned a great deal
from NI and there might still be a fruitful relationship between them. I
would not mind being a vendor to Rossi such as NI. That could be a very
fruitful relationship. I would not want to be a business partner or
investor.

As far as I know he has been quite open and fair with people such as Levi,
Essen and Kulander. They are not business partners. They have not
complained about him, and they have nothing to complain about. He never
followed through on his proposed research contract with U. Bologna, but
that is his prerogative. A businessman can decide that a contract is not in
his best interests and cancel before the final commitment deadline. That's
a normal and legit thing to do.

He is an impressive businessman and a brilliant engineer and inventor.
Unfortunately, he has serious faults, such as being sloppy with equipment,
and thin-skinned. As I said, he could not bring himself to admit that the
people from NASA were right and he was wrong, and the test failed. That was
pure egomania. It was an idiotic, self-destructive fit of pique. He should
have apologized, fixed the problem, and called them back in. They offered
to come.

This was the test described by Krivit, in a report that is correct as far
as I know. Krivit often gets things right, and I am always willing to give
him credit. I cited him in my recent paper. He has the same problem Rossi
has: he often gets it right, but sometimes his ego causes him to make
drastic mistakes, and you never tell whether you are dealing with Dr.
Jekyll or Mr. Hyde.


Since you know him so well, please explain this dichotomy in rossi's
> relationships with people; what makes a person a snake and a clown and what
> makes a person a valuable friend.
>

In my personal experience it varies from day to day, or from hour to hour,
like the weather in Pennsylvania. * I personally have been in his favor in
the morning, on the outs by afternoon, and back in his good graces the next
day. It depends on his mood. If he reads this message I am sure to be in
the doghouse tomorrow.

He has difficulty knowing friends from enemies. In my opinion he has
difficulty judging other people's intentions and capabilities. This is
unimportant example, but he rejected a visit by me because I insisted on
bringing my own instruments, and he welcomed a visit by Krivit who set no
such conditions. Some people who knew this was happening at the time warned
him that Krivit sometimes makes trouble. I think I would have done a better
job. I might have found the same result that Krivit did: no evidence of
heat. But at least I would have measured this objectively with outside
instruments leaving no doubt in anyone's mind about the result. That is
better than trying to prove the issue by guess and by golly and by making
fun of Rossi's ability to speak English as a second language.

Rossi does not want anyone to use outside instruments to establish a clear
claim one way or the other. As he says, "no tests!" That is what he told
me, which is why I did not go. Most people assume that he says this because
he is a fraud and he is hiding the truth. That assumption is entirely
reasonable. If I knew nothing about him, and I had not seen data from his
long suffering supporters, I would assume this. I think the situation is
more complicated. I agree with Mike McKubre who says Rossi wants most
people to think he has nothing, because he does not want serious
competition. Ed Storms says that if he were Rossi, with the technology in
hand, he would say nothing to anyone except investors under NDAs. He would
keep it strictly confidential. That would be a legitimate business
strategy. What Rossi is doing is kind of like that, with the added strategy
of spreading confusion and rumors that the machines do not work. That is *
not* a legitimate business strategy. It is borderline unethical.

While it is okay to say nothing, it is not okay to circulate misleading
information. Granted, this kind of deception is quite common, and has been
used by mainstream organizations such as IBM since forever. If you are
going to engage is such practices, you cannot complain when people say you
are untrustworthy or you appear to be con-man.

Rossi has no right to be upset with people who accuse him of being a
con-man, since he refuses to allow a proper independent test. The tests he
did last year were convincing to me, because the heat was so high and
because I know and trust some of the observers. But these tests were all
deeply flawed. They were deliberately bad, in ways that could have been
fixed easily in 30 minutes with a few hundred dollars in equipment. Or in
one case, for the cost of an SD card. They resembled the tests performed by
the late James Patterson. Patterson deliberately used half-assed,
kitchen-grade equipment such as dime-store thermometers and Radio Shack
power supplies. He did this so that most people would find his tests
unconvincing. That is what he and Reding told me. He wanted to convince
Motorola only, leaving the rest of the world in the dark. He ended up
convincing no one -- which is what I told him would happen, at the
time. Patterson was a professional chemist and he knew damn well how to do
a proper engineering test. He chose not to, because he wanted "a 100%
market share" as he said to me. He got 100% of the market for his device --
100% of zero, that is -- and he took that share to the grave with him.
Rossi may well do the same thing, for similar reasons.

- Jed


* Or, as Japanese men say 女心と秋の空 (a woman's heart and the autumn sky).
Women say the same thing about men.

Reply via email to