I think the claims of time dilation and anomalous decay rates also support this claim of thrust because we are upsetting the normal perpendicular relationship between 3D space and time and it is by this method we are indirectly accumulating thrust in a biased manner - a specific vector instead of a balanced cancellation - I don't see this as something for nothing but rather taking a normally balanced spatial displacement and using SR via suppression to convert some of the spatial displacement into temporal.
1. From long ago: I have been investigating a claim by Jan Naudts that the controversial hydrino and excess heat associated with atomic hydrogen and casimir cavities can be explained by relativity. Now Shawyer seems to be reversing the process using microwaves to bend spacetime to amplify radiation pressure. I have to admit there are a growing number of clues to make me consider this plausible. "cavity QED" in 1996 proposed broken isotropy in a Casimir cavity resulting in an abrupt equivalence boundary formed by the cavity walls. the shielded cavity "decelerates" relative to outside the walls possibly explaining catalytic action from a relativistic perspective. the cavity is spatially stationary but drags behind the gravitational field falling outside of it. microwave cavities like Puthoff used to explain suppression of spontaneous emission are powered by microwaves and appear to "accelerate" orbitals diffused inside - The relativistic interpretation of suppression is that the atoms are time dilated and from their perspective the spontaneous emission occurs at the normal rate. Likewise Shawyers cavity is bending space time relative to outside the cavity and even if the chamber is evacuated bent space time has a different gravitational rate proportional to time dilation. My theory is that these forces always balance in an effort to restore isotropy for instance the depletion zone in a Casimir cavity would be balanced by a concentration zone of vacuum fluctuations in the nuclei of the cavity walls due to plate like geometry. Shawyer does not need this trick to sum a depletion zone because he isn't looking for heat -he uses a microwave source and wave guide geometry to forcibly break the isotropy -I am sure the balance between isolation and concentration zones is still maintained but his device is marginally isolating one type over the other and may be using geometry to repeatedly sweep this slight differential in space time over the same spatial axis. see http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-alternate-theory-hydrino-based-relativity-26779.html From: David Roberson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Sawyer's emdrive alive and kicking in China? That is true Robin. And if momentum can be imparted upon the vacuum then perhaps this is a hint that warp drives might be possible. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Wed, Jul 25, 2012 6:23 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sawyer's emdrive alive and kicking in China? In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:10:17 -0400 (EDT): Hi, [snip] > >This is a remarkable achievement if it can be proven to perform as suggested. I have a problem with the concept of force generation without ejecting mass(or energy). The continual application of a device such as this will result in a significant amount of kinetic energy along with momentum being imparted upon the system. Clearly, a violation of conservation of momentum results. As I have suggested in the past, the only way this could work is if momentum is imparted to the vacuum itself, i.e. to the universe as a whole, thus allowing momentum to be conserved. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
