The best explanation for the Corona thermal anomaly is still ignored, despite the preponderance of evidence. This is because the source of heat is NOT nuclear and the mainstream demands that it be nuclear.
The spectrum of the corona is well-known and well studied, and all of the hydrino lines are visible according to BLP... many of them are shared with hydrogen or helium. However, there are previously unidentified lines in astrophysical data going back decades - which matches predicted dihydrino molecular rotational transitions to five figures. The only alternative explanation for the most important of these lines is a rare spectral transition of iron - the Fe ion. This lame explanation involving iron was the usual response from the mainstream until it was pointed out that there is many orders of magnitude too little iron in the corona to account for the magnitude of this line. Nevertheless, Mills is ignored. He may not be 100% correct, but to ignore him and his evidence is unscientific. -----Original Message----- From: Bastiaan Bergman http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/90 specifically: "The finding revealed that the solar corona was a few million degrees kelvin, more than three hundred times hotter than the surface of the sun below, and flew in the face of what was expected from simple thermodynamics" "It is now universally accepted that the reservoir of energy stored in the sun's atmospheric magnetic field is what heats the localized plasma in the corona. In simplified terms, the field is generated in the solar interior as a result of large-scale rotational and convective motions of the charged plasma, which serve to produce a strong (100,000 gauss) magnetic field some 200,000km below the solar surface " "What is not known, and remains under considerable debate even now, is how the energy stored in the magnetic fields is converted into heating the corona " Lesson: We have no freeking clue how fusion works
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
