Dave: You're beginning to get a hint of the expansiveness of the Collective's awareness.
There are a number of rogue thinkers that linger in obscurity and eventually die, but whose technology has some significant eye-witness reports. But for every one of them, there are tens of copy-cats who use the mythos of the dead inventor to sell books and DVDs and 'test kits', and the worst of the bunch that scam a lot of money from the foolish or too-trusting folks. This forum's purpose is to discuss these kinds of 'rogue finds'. the fringe element of sci/tech. At first it was done in USENET, in various interest groups, like sci.physics and sci.physics.fusion, but those forums were dominated by the dogmatically skeptical drones pumped out by places like Cal Tech and MIT. ;-) Vorts, as a whole, are much more tolerant of differing viewpoints; but then, an occasional sci-drone comes to play too. -mark iverson From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Inspiration Terry, where do you find these gems? I bet that no one has delivered a working model to be reproduced. How did a patent get issued for something like this? If this device works, the definition of the energy of an emitted alpha particle would need to be redefined. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 5:37 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Inspiration On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > There is no doubt it worked, and little doubt that the reason it worked had > a lot to do with radium... same as the Papp engine. Eric might like to examine the Paul Brown Battery also: http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm T
