And it is also not consistent with the Defkalion analyses. It is a complex issue. Peter
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent > to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These > reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on, > together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements. > > Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid. > > PS: a top of the line presentation. > > > Cheers: Axil > > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby <r...@hush.com> wrote: > >> >> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what >> starts the cold fusion reaction. >> >> >> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/ >> >> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco >> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up >> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in >> the Redwoods and edit lots more video. >> >> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going >> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this >> thread. Is that illegal on Vortex? >> >> I am having alot of fun making these videos. >> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie. >> >> Enjoy! >> >> >> -- >> Ruby Carat >> >> r...@coldfusionnow.org >> United States 1-707-616-4894 >> Skype ruby-carat >> www.coldfusionnow.org >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
