So sorry, please excuse me; ChemE Stewart, the uncertaty principle is the reason why your singularity theory is unworkable. At the atomic level, Gravity is too weak a force by many orders of magnitude to overcome the energies produced by a large accumulation of matter in too compacted a volume to produce a nano-singularity. You cannot overcome the exponential energy increase of compressed matter in the vacuum. Cheers: Axil
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The energy of the vacuum causes the Bosenova > > > From: http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0412041 > > > *The collapsing condensate was observed to lose atoms until the atom > number reduced to about the critical value below which a stable condensate > can exist. The dependence of the number of remaining atoms on time since > initiation of the collapse _evolve was measured for the case of an initial > state with Ninit = 16000 atoms and repulsive interaction corresponding to > ainit = +7a0, where a0 is the hydrogen Bohr radius. * > > > *The onset of number loss is quite sudden, with milliseconds of very > little loss followed by a rapid decay of condensate population (within 0.5 > ms) after which the condensate stabilizes again. This behavior results from > the scaling of the loss rate with the cube of the density, the peak value > of which rises as 1/(tcollapse − t) near the collapse point. * > > > *This allows a precise definition of the collapse time tcollapse, the > time after initiation of the collapse up to which only negligible numbers > of atoms are lost from the condensate. Another quantitative result of the > experiment is the dependence of tcollapse on the magnitude of the > attractive interaction that causes the collapse, parametrised by the > (negative) scattering length acollapse. These measurements are performed > from an initial state with Ninit = 6000 atoms in an ideal gas state (with > interaction between them tuned to zero). The tcollapse datapoints presented > in the original paper have undergone one revision of their acollapse values > by a factor of 1.166(8) due to a more precisely determined background > scattering length. * > > > * Although the main focus of this paper shall be on the collapse time, we > mention two other striking features of the experiment: the appearance of > ’bursts’ and ’jets’. One fraction of the atoms that are lost during the > collapse is expelled from the condensate at quite high energies (∼100 nK to > ∼400 nK, while the condensate temperature is 3 nK); this phenomenon was > referred to as ’bursts’. Finally, when the collapse was interrupted during > the period of number loss by a sudden jump in the scattering length, > another atom ejection mechanism was observed: ’jets’ of atoms emerge, > almost purely in the radial direction and with temperatures a lot lower > than that of the bursts (a few nK)* > > > My theory of the bosenova explosion > > When too many atoms are packed into too confined a space, the uncertainty > principle comes into play. A confined space means an uncertain(aka high) > kinetic energy. When confinement gets high enough, the associated increase > in kinetic energy destabilizes the condensate and the condensate breaks > down. When the condensate breaks down, the energy derived from the vacuum > is carried off by high energy atoms in the form of jets and bursts as > described above. > When the condensate, reaches a size small enough to reduce the uncertainty > in the condensate’s momentum, the condensate will reform with a lowered > number of member atoms. > > > Cheers: Axil > > >
