Do you favor the mystery energy source claims of LeClair and Papp? Cheers: axil
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > The underlying major hypothesis for ultimate gain is mass-to-energy > conversion, but with little or no fission, beta decay, non-reversible > fusion, or transmutation. There can be slight transmutation from QM > tunneling but far from sufficient to account for gain. The proton mass is > not quantized and is in the vicinity of 938.272013 MeV on average (even > this accepted value is in contention) this value becomes what is really an > "average mass," with expected variations higher and lower.**** > > ** ** > > The average mass can vary a fractional percent between atoms as either > "overage" or "deficit" and the hydrogen will still be hydrogen. Imagine a > bell curve of mass around the average of 938.272013 .The “overage” fraction > is in play for conversion into energy via QCD and Goldstone bosons -> > magnons. This becomes the mystery energy source for Ni-H reactions, whether > they be from Mills, Rossi, DGT, Piantelli, Celani, or Thermacore. It begins > with spillover hydrogen and a Casimir connection – in the geometry or in > the metal porosity. And next a ferromagnetic catalyst with a Curie point > that serves as a trigger temperature, and around which gain is seen. **** > > ** ** > > =====================================================================**** > > ** ** > > Well – yes – the theory is falsifiable in exactly this way, but of course > - you only do mass spectrometry on the hydrogen fill not the entire device. > **** > > ** ** > > And yes – at least I have heard that SRI has an instrument sensitive > enough to do this kind of measurement on hydrogen – but for whatever > reason, it is not in use as of this date. It would indeed take a very > sophisticated piece of equipment - as the proton mass on average will not > go down by more than a fractional percent following a long gainful run, > like the 50 hours of Celani.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] **** > > ** ** > > Energy comes from proton mass depletion > > So... the way to test this theory is to weigh the thing before & after the > experiment? Does any LENR researcher have equipment sensitive enough to > detect the difference in proton mass depletion? **** > > ** ** >
