I think Roth's reaction is a bit childish. Simply because he does not like
the way he was treated is no reason to trash all of WP. We should not throw
the baby out with the bath water. I wrote 75% of the article on "Soil" and
would hate to see "my" beautiful baby destroyed.
Zedshort
----- Original Message -----
From: "MJ" <feli...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia E-Cat article for deletion
On 09-Sep-12 15:36, Alan Fletcher wrote:
From: "Kelley Trezise" <ktrez2...@ssvecnet.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 9, 2012 9:31:22 AM
Some time back I fought the battle of the E-Cat article on Wikipedia
but found it too frustrating and in the end even enfuriating as there
are some very tennatious editiors that really, really don't like cold
fusion articles in any way shape or form. Their obnoxious behavior
have driven off the more moderate people and as a result have had
their way and have written a very twisted article.
I think it's just time to give up on that wiki. Brian Josephson gave up.
I gave up (Alanf777) . Others gave up.
It's so distorted that it's better just to delete it.
If and when something happens (and is reported in the main stream
scientific journals and/or media) then it can be reconstructed -- one way
or another.
http://truthfall.com/wikipedia-editor-bias-gets-in-the-way-of-facts/
MJ
