http://www.google.com/patents?id=WhIgAgAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=%22Low+Energy+Nuclear+Reaction%22&source=bl&ots=Xuf1yRH2vB&sig=142QFcoB_2WmhjeCiLVn9AuUGlU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=qEROUKH4JsjSrQHKmIGoBw&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBQ&goback=.gde_4132340_member_161859049#v=onepage&q&f=false
Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much because of what the patent covers, but because the USPTO actually granted it? Claim 11, for example, specifically mentions charged particles and x-rays. Or perhaps the fact that the claims aren't limited to CF/LENR (e.g. also superconductivity, claim 12) was significant? Jeff On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:50 AM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > Courtesy of "LENR Forum" - Follow links at - > > http://www.lenrforum.eu/viewtopic.php?t=569&p=2283 > > U.S. Patent No. US 8,227,020 July 24, 2012 > > ABSTRACT: > > Techniques to form dislocation cores along an interface of a multilayer > thin > film structure are described. The loading and/or deloading of isotopes of > hydrogen are also described in association with core formation. The > described techniques can be applied to superconductive structure formation, > x-ray and charged particle generation, nuclear reaction processes, and/or > inertial confinement targets. > > >
